It's The Ashes (again)
How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match???
Reply
(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match???

Stokes team lost the dam test!!!..
Steve Smith’s contribution resulted in his team winning the test he rightly was MOM.
Reply
In a test full of massive swings, usually from the batting side throwing away a massive advantage.

The one key session I would pick out, was yesterday evening, there was very little the batsmen could do in the face of some brilliant bowling from Statc and Cummins.

Brilliant effort from Stokes and Duckett, both would have been worthy winners of the man of the match award. But it was always improbable they we would win.
Reply
(07-02-2023, 03:51 PM)pindgill Wrote:
(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match???

Stokes team lost the dam test!!!..
Steve Smith’s contribution resulted in his team winning the test he rightly was MOM.
Load of bollocks, man of the match should be based on best individual performance in the game
Hence Stokes should have got.
Reply
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/j...land-ashes

Hope they hand out appropriate sanctions to the guilty parties.
Inexcusable no matter what has gone on in the game.
Reply
(07-02-2023, 04:32 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/j...land-ashes

Hope they hand out appropriate sanctions to the guilty parties.
Inexcusable no matter what has gone on in the game.

Got to hand it to them, nobody beats an aussie at crybabbying.
Reply
Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me.
Reply
(07-02-2023, 05:03 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me.

I thought Sky were bang out of order even trying to compare the two events, I suppose when you have aussies part of the commentary team you must look for balance

CDG was wrapped on the pad, the appeal went up for LBW, he went to run, then turned back and was ran out when the ball went to gully and Pope threw the stumps down

Bairstow's dimissal today was like chalk and cheese, he's rubbed his foot on the crease after the ball has gone through to the keeper, trying to denote he's "in" and has walked down the pitch to his batting partner

By the laws he's out, Carey actualy hasn't done much wrong but to compare it to the CDG - Pope incident is utter bollocks

Cuzer

(07-02-2023, 03:51 PM)pindgill Wrote:
(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match???

Stokes team lost the dam test!!!..
Steve Smith’s contribution resulted in his team winning the test he rightly was MOM.

When did the winning player ever have to be MOM?

It's based on an individuals performance, not who won the game?

Cuzer
Fisheatingdeludedsealwankers
Reply
(07-02-2023, 05:06 PM)Cuzer Wrote:
(07-02-2023, 05:03 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me.

I thought Sky were bang out of order even trying to compare the two events, I suppose when you have aussies part of the commentary team you must look for balance

CDG was wrapped on the pad, the appeal went up for LBW, he went to run, then turned back and was ran out when the ball went to gully and Pope threw the stumps down

Bairstow's dimissal today was like chalk and cheese, he's rubbed his foot on the crease after the ball has gone through to the keeper, trying to denote he's "in" and has walked down the pitch to his batting partner

By the laws he's out, Carey actualy hasn't done much wrong but to compare it to the CDG - Pope incident is utter bollocks

Cuzer

(07-02-2023, 03:51 PM)pindgill Wrote:
(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match???

Stokes team lost the dam test!!!..
Steve Smith’s contribution resulted in his team winning the test he rightly was MOM.

When did the winning player ever have to be MOM?

It's based on an individuals performance, not who won the game?

Cuzer
Exactly right. By extension of the 'must be on the winning side' logic, an all-rounder who scored double centuries in both innings out of a total of 400 (cos everybody else scored none) and took all 20 opposition wickets but lost the game as the other side scored 500 in 2 innings would not be eligible for MOTM. Nonsense. Stokes' was easily the outstanding performance of the 5 days, with nods to Smith and Duckett, and maybe Starc.
Reply
(07-02-2023, 05:06 PM)Cuzer Wrote:
(07-02-2023, 05:03 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me.

I thought Sky were bang out of order even trying to compare the two events, I suppose when you have aussies part of the commentary team you must look for balance

CDG was wrapped on the pad, the appeal went up for LBW, he went to run, then turned back and was ran out when the ball went to gully and Pope threw the stumps down

Bairstow's dimissal today was like chalk and cheese, he's rubbed his foot on the crease after the ball has gone through to the keeper, trying to denote he's "in" and has walked down the pitch to his batting partner

By the laws he's out, Carey actualy hasn't done much wrong but to compare it to the CDG - Pope incident is utter bollocks

Cuzer

(07-02-2023, 03:51 PM)pindgill Wrote:
(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match???

Stokes team lost the dam test!!!..
Steve Smith’s contribution resulted in his team winning the test he rightly was MOM.

When did the winning player ever have to be MOM?

It's based on an individuals performance, not who won the game?

Cuzer

It seems your clutching at straws because the Ashes are lost there’s more chance of a 0-5 whitewash than England coming back to draw the series let alone win 3-2!!!.. Huh
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)