09-17-2022, 04:32 PM
That’s ten games
|
09-17-2022, 04:37 PM
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract? That's the problem ,would you trust the muppets in the suits to find anybody ?The problem is Bruce n co Gourlay n Co it's just a job with ridiculous pay and they won't give a flying fuck when they go ,as usual it's us fans who have the disappointment of what's happening .
09-17-2022, 04:41 PM
09-17-2022, 04:47 PM
(09-17-2022, 04:41 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract? 1 win in 10 - the exception that makes the rule so far. 7 poiints from the other 9 games How on earth is he still here
09-17-2022, 04:50 PM
And amongst those games we scrambled a point at the death against Burnley, needed Watford to miss a penalty to take a point and came from 2-0 down at Hudds. We could easily be on less points.
09-17-2022, 04:50 PM
If Hull hadn't gifted us that own goal that gifted us the momentum does anyone think we'd have won that game. We could be sitting here winless
09-17-2022, 04:52 PM
09-17-2022, 04:55 PM
(09-17-2022, 04:41 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract? He’s only got nine months left on his contract, can’t imagine it would cost that much to pay him off.
09-17-2022, 05:06 PM
(09-17-2022, 04:55 PM)Duffers Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:41 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract? However long he's got left on his contract you have to pay all his cronies as well and since we can't afford a transfer fee is the any money to do this ?
09-17-2022, 05:13 PM
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)