England v India Test Series!!..

[rsbaggy2]

Can only assume you've never played the game. Having a substitute wicketkeeper on the field for the entirety of both innings is a massive advantage, if the injured party is still allowed to bat with no penalty for time off the field.

You assume too much. I would rather have a fit Pant keeping wicket and batting.

The 12 v 13 was as nonsensical as your 11 v 12.
If an England player had the same misfortune I don't think you would be so flippant about a sub keeper.

We should start doing it. Get Smith to wear one on the wrist on the first morning of the test and have Foakes as a named 12th man. Job done. It's a joke and one of the laws that needs looking at.

Jurel is fundamentally a better wicketkeeper. The fatigue of keeping wicket and also batting long innings should not be understated.

So you would ask a player to deliberately injure themselves to gain what you perceive as an advantage.

Well that's one of your best. Stunner.