Working people

[CarlosCorbewrong]

Again, I'm not arguing. In fact, if you look carefully at my opening post on the subject it says:

"Unfortunately the solutions to all of these things require ingenuity/cross-departmental work and money. The government has neither."

My 3rd post said "you'll see no criticism from me about stopping benefits for workshy people who are able to work"

My 5th post said "Go and kick a poor person or whatever it is that you lot do to relieve stress"

Seriously mate - calm down - go and kick a poor person or whatever it is that you lot do to relieve stress.

[baggy1]

I'm really calm - you read far too much into posts I'm afraid resulting in your 'fishing' expeditions to get a nibble.

[man in the corner shop]

Ah the old ‘Proth’ insult when you can’t be bothered to face up to the points you make yourself. Your own words highlight an abuse of the benefits system by referencing those that have devalued work. That in itself should lead to stricter criteria.

I'm bloody lost around here.
I genuinely thought Baggy1 is Proth under another persona.
I also understand that baggiejacko is the same as whackojacko. Am I wrong about that too.
I cant keep up with it all. Its like cluedo on speed this place.

For the avoidance of doubt, I am Putney Tim who loves nothing better than a good swish around the twatter cesspit.

[Baggiejacko]

Ah the old ‘Proth’ insult when you can’t be bothered to face up to the points you make yourself. Your own words highlight an abuse of the benefits system by referencing those that have devalued work. That in itself should lead to stricter criteria.

I'm bloody lost around here.
I genuinely thought Baggy1 is Proth under another persona.
I also understand that baggiejacko is the same as whackojacko. Am I wrong about that too.
I cant keep up with it all. Its like cluedo on speed this place.

For the avoidance of doubt, I am Putney Tim who loves nothing better than a good swish around the twatter cesspit.

I'm me only. I aint clever enough to pretend to be 2 people and use the same name as a disguise. That would be a fiendish plot or a very stoopid one. Probably taken from an Allo, Allo script. Have a lovely evening.

[man in the corner shop]

Ah the old ‘Proth’ insult when you can’t be bothered to face up to the points you make yourself. Your own words highlight an abuse of the benefits system by referencing those that have devalued work. That in itself should lead to stricter criteria.

I'm bloody lost around here.
I genuinely thought Baggy1 is Proth under another persona.
I also understand that baggiejacko is the same as whackojacko. Am I wrong about that too.
I cant keep up with it all. Its like cluedo on speed this place.

For the avoidance of doubt, I am Putney Tim who loves nothing better than a good swish around the twatter cesspit.

I'm me only. I aint clever enough to pretend to be 2 people and use the same name as a disguise. That would be a fiendish plot or a very stoopid one. Probably taken from an Allo, Allo script. Have a lovely evening.

Thank you for clearing that up. 
Like you I do not have the brains to be 2 people. I can barely remember what I've said as 1 person....bar it is likely to be the same old shite.
Goodnight to you.

[baggy1]

I've only ever been baggy1 going back all the way to Hawthorns Heartbeat on the old E&D site. Never felt the need to reinvent my persona and never been banned so didn't need to get a new name.

I'd be surprised if Proth was found out to have had different personas as well.

[Derek Hardballs]

I've only ever been baggy1 going back all the way to Hawthorns Heartbeat on the old E&D site. Never felt the need to reinvent my persona and never been banned so didn't need to get a new name.

I'd be surprised if Proth was found out to have had different personas as well.

I can see why there is so much confusion, yours and Proth’s views are so similar it’s difficult to tell you apart.

[baggy1]

I've only ever been baggy1 going back all the way to Hawthorns Heartbeat on the old E&D site. Never felt the need to reinvent my persona and never been banned so didn't need to get a new name.

I'd be surprised if Proth was found out to have had different personas as well.

I can see why there is so much confusion, yours and Proth’s views are so similar it’s difficult to tell you apart.

It would be interesting to see what your views were Dekka apart from wanting something different that involves unicorns and fairy tales.

You keep avoiding the question on benefits - any chance you could go back to the thread and answer the question.