That’s ten games
#11
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

And this is the big problem seeing as we are skint
Reply
#12
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

That's the problem ,would you trust the muppets in the suits to find anybody ?The problem is Bruce n co Gourlay n Co it's just a job with ridiculous pay and they won't give a flying fuck when they go ,as usual it's us fans who have the disappointment  of what's happening  .
Reply
#13
(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

And this is the big problem seeing as we are skint

We've got £5M to spunk on paying off managers soon.
Reply
#14
(09-17-2022, 04:41 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

And this is the big problem seeing as we are skint

We've got £5M to spunk on paying off managers soon.

1 win in 10 - the exception that makes the rule so far.
7 poiints from the other 9 games
How on earth is he still here
Reply
#15
And amongst those games we scrambled a point at the death against Burnley, needed Watford to miss a penalty to take a point and came from 2-0 down at Hudds. We could easily be on less points.
Reply
#16
If Hull hadn't gifted us that own goal that gifted us the momentum does anyone think we'd have won that game. We could be sitting here winless
Reply
#17
(09-17-2022, 04:50 PM)Sliced Wrote: If Hull hadn't gifted us that own goal that gifted us the momentum does anyone think we'd have won that game. We could be sitting here winless

They had hit the bar too before that gift.
Reply
#18
(09-17-2022, 04:41 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

And this is the big problem seeing as we are skint

We've got £5M to spunk on paying off managers soon.

He’s only got nine months left on his contract, can’t imagine it would cost that much to pay him off.
Reply
#19
(09-17-2022, 04:55 PM)Duffers Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:41 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:32 PM)TETLEY74 Wrote:
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

And this is the big problem seeing as we are skint

We've got £5M to spunk on paying off managers soon.

He’s only got nine months left on his contract, can’t imagine it would cost that much to pay him off.

However long he's got left on his contract you have to pay all his cronies as well and since we can't afford a transfer fee is the any money to do this ?
Reply
#20
(09-17-2022, 04:29 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote: Not a reason to keep Bruce, but who could we reasonably attract?

It does worry me who Gourmet has further down his mates list if Brucey was his first choice last time
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)