The stupid injury rule.
#1
Your player gets fouled and injured by the opposition, trainer comes on, treats player who then has to stand on the sidelines for 30 secs,giving the opposition the advantage. How can this be right.
In one game this season we had 2 on the sidelines at the same time and had to continue with 9 men.
This is a pathetic rule especially for legitimate injuries, caused by the opposition. Angry
Reply
#2
I thought if injury was due to a foul, then 30 seconds rule didn't apply.
Reply
#3
(01-19-2025, 02:49 PM)wba13 Wrote: Your player gets fouled and injured by the opposition, trainer comes on, treats player who then has to stand on the sidelines for 30 secs,giving the opposition the advantage. How can this be right.
In one game this season we had 2 on the sidelines at the same time and had to continue with 9 men.
This is a pathetic rule especially for legitimate injuries, caused by the opposition. Angry

Agree. Surely the player who committed the foul should have to spend the same 30's off the pitch as the injured player.
Reply
#4
Players and manager got the players to go down ‘injured’ for any knock to stop the game. This attempts to stop that but players who are really fouled suffer. Not the perfect solution but it stops players going down just for tactical reasons.
Reply
#5
Players that go down for play to be stopped, then turning out to be not really injured are the biggest annoyance in the game right now
Reply
#6
I’ve often mentioned this stupid, pointless rule.
Reply
#7
(01-19-2025, 03:07 PM)Shabby Russian Wrote: I thought if injury was due to a foul, then 30 seconds rule didn't apply.

I don't think it applies if the player who committed the foul gets a booking.
Reply
#8
This injury rule hasn't stopped the fake injuries, or the slowing down of the game.

Ultimately it's impossible to tell if an injury is fake or genuine. The rule needs scrapping, and if a player is deemed fit by the medical staff, then he should be on the pitch for the restart.

Play acting and time wasting is sadly part of the game. I don't think any rule will stamp it out. What's the alternative? Tell refs to play on and ignore players they suspect are pla-acting?

What, then, happens if there's a genuine injury, and the ref plays on believing it to be an act?
Reply
#9
(01-19-2025, 06:21 PM)Josh1873 Wrote: This injury rule hasn't stopped the fake injuries, or the slowing down of the game.

Ultimately it's impossible to tell if an injury is fake or genuine. The rule needs scrapping, and if a player is deemed fit by the medical staff, then he should be on the pitch for the restart.

Play acting and time wasting is sadly part of the game. I don't think any rule will stamp it out. What's the alternative? Tell refs to play on and ignore players they suspect are play-acting?

What, then, happens if there's a genuine injury, and the ref plays on believing it to be an act?
Cynical fouls and time wasting/injury time really grind my gears


The time elapsed in the game should be visible to all, and stopped by the ref when a player is down. The time is started by the ref when the player gets back up or goes off the pitch for treatment. If this is the result of a foul, yellow card the offending player and sin-bin them for 10 minutes.

Or....

If a player goes down injured where no foul looks to have been committed (i.e. when an 'injury' stops the player from continuing) even if no physios come on the pitch the time is stopped until the player goes off, they are kept off for a minute and then are allowed to re-enter the field of play.  The only exception to this would be to substitute the player that's gone down.  If this happens the clock is stopped until the substitution is made. The time elapsed is visible to both teams in this example as well.

This would also allow the game to be stopped at 90 minutes, rather than playing any injury time and also past any 'additional' time just because a team is in an attacking position. Think the goal scored by the Liverpool keeper against us in the 95th minute of injury time when only 4 minutes were added with no reason to stop the clock during the 4 minutes.....so frustrating. 

Games would initially go on for ages, with Managers moaning about 'my players were tired, playing 100 minutes etc etc' but they would only be playing for 90 mins, as the clock would show this. 

Other rule changes......

Personally I would like to see every cynical foul given a straight red with a three match ban.

Also where a player commits a deliberate foul that results in the injury of another (think that twat Ballard) the fouling player should be banned for the length of time that the injured player is not available for their team. 

As for Keepers, they would be given 15 seconds to get the ball back in play (20 seconds for a goal kick). Any breach of this would result in a yellow card. This would stop the 'catching the ball and falling to the floor' shit we see all the time.

The same length of time would be given for throw ins. If the 15 seconds elapses, the throw in is given to the other side. Assistant refs could also be given that spray they use in free kicks to indicate where the throw should be taken from.  If a player is seen to be trying to gain an unfair advantage by going past this point when throwing the ball in, the throw in is awarded to the other team. 

It would only take a season to sort out all the shitty behaviour.
Sponsored by Bet365 - other betting sites are available
Reply
#10
Time wasting has always gone on, but where it used to be a petty annoyance, it's now ruining games. Maybe I'm noticing it more because generally, we spend more time chasing games after falling behind.

There's quite a bit of talk of having a clock that stops everytime the game stops, with a reduction in game time to 30 minutes per half. Well, bollocks to that. I pay for 45 minutes per half. Does this also not suggest an acknowledgement that half an hour per game is currently being wasted, yet we get around 6 or 7 minutes in added time. 

It's fairly clear that the crackdown that started following the last World Cup has been quietly ditched. I thought it worked well. If a team wastes 10 minutes then add 10 minutes. Now we're back to teams realising that if they roll around injured for 4 minutes then take a minute and a half to take the resultant free kick, the ref will only add 2 minutes. It's cheating, and it's paying supporters who are being cheated.

Maybe I'm too critical towards the refs for the players cheating, but if every damned one of us can see what's happening, why can't they? Every time I reffed an Eddie Howe match where his team are winning, I'dd add 20 minutes to each half. That might just about cover the rolling around mardarsery. If every ref did that, his players would stop doing it, wouldn't they?

Right now, I feel that time wasting is football's biggest issue, on the pitch at least. It's absolutely killing the game.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: