Posts: 22,415
Threads: 960
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
49
I’m happy to put my balls on the line and suggest that Wilder’s Boro will finish above Bruce’s Albion next year.
(Null and void if either is replaced)
Posts: 4,568
Threads: 131
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
26
05-08-2022, 03:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2022, 03:35 PM by HawkingsHalfpint.)
Wilder wouldn’t have solved all of the problems, but was absolutely the best fit at the time. Big opportunity missed for stupid, non-footballing reasons, and the rest is just a consequence. In any case I truly hope no eco-town deals were harmed as a result of this decision.
Posts: 5,037
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
14
(05-08-2022, 11:53 AM)Derek Hardballs Wrote: (05-07-2022, 05:21 PM)Cuzer Wrote: (05-07-2022, 03:33 PM)Derek Hardballs Wrote: (05-07-2022, 03:01 PM)Cuzer Wrote: Didn’t he take them from 16th to 7th and Bruce us 5th to 10th…..
Just saying loike
Cuzer
If you forget our run of form, the games in hand of other teams, how bunched up the league was and the fact that almost every team we played had worked out our binary tactics by the time Val left then yes.
What's that got to to do with the opening post you absolute cornet!
Sake
Cuzer
Because the ‘we were on 5th place’ when he left argument is a wafer thin defence of a manager whose results and performances were only going in one direction and it wasn’t up. The same defence is also used as proof that Bruce shouldn’t be manager next season.
Thanks for the explanation
The original post was an ode to the fact Wilder hadn’t done very well, I was merely stating he had done a fine job given what he inherited, that was it
Cuzer
Fisheatingdeludedsealwankers