02-27-2022, 09:53 AM
HawkingsHalfpint Wrote:Regardless of the feeling on Bruce, his approach, the advantages (if any) he will bring; you have to ask how once again the situation has been allowed to develop whereby we’re calling on him in the first place.
I said the same last year over BFS. It was equivalent of calling on a relief manager to turnaround a once decent pub that’s gone to shit. None of these people seem to have any accountability, yet can walk away with a huge pocket of cash each time win or lose. It’s the same for everyone else of course, but we’re definitely missing something that we once had; and seemed to lose during the Pulis era.
These are my thoughts too. I still believe BFS could have done a job here but he knew the kitty was low and the situation unfavourable. Whoever came in was going to have to work with what we have (minus the best player in the league) and a collection of freebies and loans. Plus we had the lingering "losing" mentality earned over the last season and a half. The manager then chosen by the club just wasn't the right fit (for more than one reason).
So now we are in a situation where the club almost certainly won't be in a position dire enough to appoint anything other than the experienced manager we have seen fail so many times previously, that does not play youth and will rarely excite the fanbase. My gut feeling is that Bruce should steady the ship but I'm not convinced he will be anything like the catalyst required to spark the club out of it's torpor.