Sneekes

[MGalea]

Too many pancakes!

[CA Baggie]

Kept most of the clubs top earners, spent millions on decent loan players + wages, given 10M with most of it wasted on Kyle fuggin Bartley,
and allowed to bring in an ex Derby County mate, if that isn't backing him then I don't know what is.

You don't know what is then.

[aj21]

Fucking comedy that people think he’s been backed. Are you lot Jenkins and his family?

[Three Degrees]

Those top earners are only still here because they must have flex down contracts on relegation otherwise they would have been long gone the loan players brought in are probably on less moneythan most of our squad and add the fact that we didnt really open the purse strings in transfer fees then i would say BD has done well under the circumstances .

[WorcBaggie]

Fucking comedy that people think he’s been backed. Are you lot Jenkins and his family?

Depends on the context. A relegated team keeping the likes of Gibbs, JRod, Dawson, Hegazi etc (there were reported bids for most of those) and signing the championships best keeper, from last season, as well as 4 quality loans in January could be described as being backed. 

Personally, I think DM has been backed enough to mount a promotion challenge which he is doing.

Can't think of any manager in any league who doesn't want more.

[CA Baggie]

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/champions...GB2/plus/1

19th in the net loss\surplus league - a £12.5m profit.

Stoke, being top, with a net loss of £29.5m.

I know that doesn't tell the full picture of players staying etc. but it does tell you he hasn't been particularly backed. That's before you get into the lack of infrastructure around the club to help support a fella who, no scouting network etc.

[aj21]

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/champions...GB2/plus/1

19th in the net loss\surplus league - a £12.5m profit.  

Stoke, being top, with a net loss of £29.5m.

I know that doesn't tell the full picture of players staying etc. but it does tell you he hasn't been particularly backed.  That's before you get into the lack of infrastructure around the club to help support a fella who, no scouting network etc.

This and more!

[albion_pigeon]

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/champions...GB2/plus/1

19th in the net loss\surplus league - a £12.5m profit.  

Stoke, being top, with a net loss of £29.5m.

I know that doesn't tell the full picture of players staying etc. but it does tell you he hasn't been particularly backed.  That's before you get into the lack of infrastructure around the club to help support a fella who, no scouting network etc.

That table highlights what a great job Farke has done at Norwich.

Sitting pretty at the top of the table having made a profit of £28.94 mil!

[Remi_Moses]

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/champions...GB2/plus/1

19th in the net loss\surplus league - a £12.5m profit.  

Stoke, being top, with a net loss of £29.5m.

I know that doesn't tell the full picture of players staying etc. but it does tell you he hasn't been particularly backed.  That's before you get into the lack of infrastructure around the club to help support a fella who, no scouting network etc.

That table highlights what a great job Farke has done at Norwich.

Sitting pretty at the top of the table having made a profit of £28.94 mil!

Maddison and Murphy fetched £33 Million and he has fantastic job with his purchases.