10-03-2020, 02:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2020, 02:14 PM by Big Daddy Cool.)
(10-03-2020, 11:26 AM)Derek Hardballs Wrote: It wasn’t an odd appointment at all. It was a logical one based on the club believing it’s own hype in terms of thinking the ‘Head Coaching system’ was bullet proof. The parameters set were for a respected experienced coach not a manager, who would work within our rigid structure of DoF, coaches and scouts. If you take that into account his appointment hit all the criteria asked. He was appointed to coach the team, have limited input into signings and limited coaching support of his choice.
Not bizarre, odd or strange appointment at all, in fact it was very a logical appointment sadly the system was only as good as those employed within it. A point lost on some at the time and even now it seems.
Yep, spot on. If he had the transfer window and players we delivered for Clarke in 2012 then i'm sure we'd be saying more positive things about Irvine. Our signings in Irvine's season were very poor and didn't help him. If we still had Ashworth here then it could have worked. He's nowhere near as bad as some suggest though. He was fighting an uphill battle from the off which is why it was not the right appointment.