Posts: 250
Threads: 20
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
02-03-2026, 01:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2026, 01:58 PM by throstle2000.)
Thanks for the info
(02-03-2026, 12:01 PM)Tom Joad 25 Wrote: (02-03-2026, 11:54 AM)throstle2000 Wrote: I'm flying into Birmingham airport tomorrow,be nice to go back to the shrine, we play Stoke, I'm really hoping for 3 points on Saturday against the clay heads, I will have to stay in that dog hole of a place Wolverhampton,where I have a place , i will get the Metro to the Hawthorn stop, can anyone tell if there is a decent pub there or not, thanks on advance, COYB
Get your beer in the Great Western, Wolvo then 15 minutes on the tram. Maybe leap off at Dudley St. just before West Brom, 2 minute walk to The Old Hope Pole or the Wheatsheaf. All good ales and crusty cobs. Obviously no colours in the Wolvo one. There's little by the ground and that end of West Brom it's lagers or cider apart from the overpriced and overrated Vine. Thanks for the info.
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 423
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
27
Why do posters keep picking Campbell when we were told on Saturday he was out for 2 to 3 weeks with an injury. Bizarre if he’s suddenly fit.
Posts: 1,237
Threads: 20
Joined: Sep 2025
Reputation:
10
(02-03-2026, 01:56 PM)throstle2000 Wrote: Thanks for the info
(02-03-2026, 12:01 PM)Tom Joad 25 Wrote: (02-03-2026, 11:54 AM)throstle2000 Wrote: I'm flying into Birmingham airport tomorrow,be nice to go back to the shrine, we play Stoke, I'm really hoping for 3 points on Saturday against the clay heads, I will have to stay in that dog hole of a place Wolverhampton,where I have a place , i will get the Metro to the Hawthorn stop, can anyone tell if there is a decent pub there or not, thanks on advance, COYB
Get your beer in the Great Western, Wolvo then 15 minutes on the tram. Maybe leap off at Dudley St. just before West Brom, 2 minute walk to The Old Hope Pole or the Wheatsheaf. All good ales and crusty cobs and 2 minutes walk back to the tram. Obviously no colours in the Wolvo one. There's little by the ground and that end of West Brom it's lagers or cider apart from the overpriced and overrated Vine. Thanks for the info.
Posts: 12
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2026
Reputation:
0
(02-03-2026, 01:05 PM)UCEbaggie Wrote: Imray looked completely hopeless on Saturday. Good job we haven’t signed him from the Villa is all I can say.
They all looked completely lost Saturday. Every single team in the 92 would have beaten us Saturday.
Posts: 901
Threads: 28
Joined: Sep 2025
Reputation:
1
(02-03-2026, 02:00 PM)wba13 Wrote: Why do posters keep picking Campbell when we were told on Saturday he was out for 2 to 3 weeks with an injury. Bizarre if he’s suddenly fit.
I read 1-2 weeks.
Posts: 2,921
Threads: 20
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
8
(02-03-2026, 01:14 PM)Lurker#3 Wrote: (02-03-2026, 01:00 PM)Dumbo Wrote: (02-03-2026, 12:26 PM)Lurker#3 Wrote: What I would pick;
Griffiths
Campbell Phillips Diakite
Imray Price Mowatt Styles
Jimoh Heggebo MJ
What I think he will pick;
MOL
Campbell Phillips Mepham
Imray Molumby Diakite Styles
Price Heggebo MK
Both horrific tbf.
Let me guess you'd want to play; a flat back four with 2 of Diakite, mOwatt and Molumby together in the middle?
Because that's worked so well so far.
It worked a damn sight better than a back 3! By a mile!
A back 4 wasn’t the problem under Mason. We were competitive. I still can’t believe anyone is now suggesting a back 3 after the last 4 games. It’s extraordinary. It’s taken us from average to uttter shit, as we don’t have the squad for it.
Posts: 8,163
Threads: 440
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
30
02-03-2026, 02:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2026, 02:41 PM by Lurker#3.)
(02-03-2026, 02:27 PM)backsidebaggie Wrote: It worked a damn sight better than a back 3! By a mile!
A back 4 wasn’t the problem under Mason. We were competitive. I still can’t believe anyone is now suggesting a back 3 after the last 4 games. It’s extraordinary. It’s taken us from average to uttter shit, as we don’t have the squad for it.
No issues with people writing a back 4 down if that's how they get their kicks.
To be fair my suggested team can quite easily line up as a 4 or a 5. It's about the balance of the playing profiles. Not the formation.
Posts: 15,684
Threads: 575
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
111
(02-03-2026, 02:27 PM)backsidebaggie Wrote: (02-03-2026, 01:14 PM)Lurker#3 Wrote: (02-03-2026, 01:00 PM)Dumbo Wrote: (02-03-2026, 12:26 PM)Lurker#3 Wrote: What I would pick;
Griffiths
Campbell Phillips Diakite
Imray Price Mowatt Styles
Jimoh Heggebo MJ
What I think he will pick;
MOL
Campbell Phillips Mepham
Imray Molumby Diakite Styles
Price Heggebo MK
Both horrific tbf.
Let me guess you'd want to play; a flat back four with 2 of Diakite, mOwatt and Molumby together in the middle?
Because that's worked so well so far.
It worked a damn sight better than a back 3! By a mile!
A back 4 wasn’t the problem under Mason. We were competitive. I still can’t believe anyone is now suggesting a back 3 after the last 4 games. It’s extraordinary. It’s taken us from average to uttter shit, as we don’t have the squad for it.
Quite… but just one more game playing a system that is stinking the place out will see it right! In almost every game under Mason we were competitive, we lost mainly due to stupid individual mistakes defensively and piss poor decision making and finishing up front. It wasn’t the tactics or formation that were the problem it was down imo to the quality of players every bit as much as the inexperienced manager. Oh and I thought it was a mistake to bring Mason into the club in the first place… but I’ve been pretty much against almost every decision the club have made since TM was appointed.
Posts: 1,237
Threads: 20
Joined: Sep 2025
Reputation:
10
If we have to persist with 3cbs I think we should look at Diakite as one. He had probably his best game for us as a cb.
Posts: 2,921
Threads: 20
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
8
02-03-2026, 02:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2026, 02:52 PM by backsidebaggie.)
(02-03-2026, 02:37 PM)Lurker#3 Wrote: (02-03-2026, 02:27 PM)backsidebaggie Wrote: It worked a damn sight better than a back 3! By a mile!
A back 4 wasn’t the problem under Mason. We were competitive. I still can’t believe anyone is now suggesting a back 3 after the last 4 games. It’s extraordinary. It’s taken us from average to uttter shit, as we don’t have the squad for it.
No issues with people writing a back 4 down if that's how they get their kicks.
To be fair my suggested team can quite easily line up as a 4 or a 5. It's about the balance of the playing profiles. Not the formation.
If that’s how they get their kicks? I don’t think it’s getting kicks. I think it’s their eyes seeing the last 4 games the formation has been a disaster as we haven’t got the squad to play it.
Balance of the playing profiles? FFS. At this point I have to loff.
|