Is it the end of Johnson?
#81
https://twitter.com/Smyth_Chris/status/1...3MIbA&s=19

Fantastic new tory slogan "do less better"
Reply
#82
(07-06-2022, 09:02 PM)hudds Wrote:
(07-06-2022, 08:55 PM)WorcsWBA Wrote: This evening Johnson is showing himself to be the shameless, self-serving narcissist that we all know he is; he clearly regards himself as parliamentary royalty who can do whatever he likes. The weakness of the 1922 Committee in not taking any action until at least Monday has emboldened Johnson to continue his delusion that he can still remain in office, encouraged by his remaining freakish and equally shameless supporters in parliament who can't see beyond mindless and fawning fealty to him.

There either needs to be mass cabinet resignations or the 1922 Committee needs to act sooner than it's planning to, otherwise a man who is a disgrace to politics gets to live out the charade that he has a future as PM for a few more days (his Parliamentary Private Secretary is still bizarrely claiming that he has the support of a majority of the people, despite polls showing that 69% of people think he should resign), whilst the country he pretends to act on behalf of is completely rudderless apart from his increasingly deranged behaviour.

An eternal plague on the Tory MPs for unleashing this monster on us in the first place despite knowing what he was like.

or thanks for showing what's behind the mask of what has become the English Nationalist Party.

Speaking of Nationalist Parties (as much as they protest about it) the SNP are currently trying to dig a bigger holethreatening the victim of one of their sex pest ex-MPs.
Reply
#83
We're not in Kansas anymore, that's for sure.
Reply
#84
This is an absolute car crash. Everytime you think this is the moment he just carries on.

It's beyond parody now but enthralling at the same time.

Think the whole of the cabinet are going to have to go to get him out.
Reply
#85
(07-06-2022, 09:13 PM)Shabby Russian Wrote: We're not in Kansas anymore, that's for sure.

We bay in Dudlay, neither.
Reply
#86
The queen could refuse him an election if he goes down that route as the largest party can form a government but he as leader can’t.
Reply
#87
(07-06-2022, 09:26 PM)TTM2 Wrote: The queen could refuse him an election if he goes down that route as the largest party can form a government but he as leader can’t.

You really think the queen will use any of her ‘powers’ to step in, she’s loving this as much as us  Big Grin

He’ll be in Kiev tomorrow, any money
Reply
#88
(07-06-2022, 08:55 PM)WorcsWBA Wrote: The weakness of the 1922 Committee in not taking any action until at least Monday 

That's a bit unfair. The 22 has to do things by the book, if only to distinguish itself from the PM.

A few days doesn't matter at all. In fact it would be useful to illustrate BJ's inability to actually form a functioning government. There simply aren't enough people to go on the payroll. He has no friends. There's no Johnsonism. He is to Thatcher what Brown was to Blair.
Reply
#89
Imagine having voted for this shower, shame on you
Reply
#90
(07-06-2022, 10:10 PM)Loanee Wrote: Imagine having voted for this shower, shame on you

To be fair, the other option wasn't credible so it's easy to see why people voted for him. The broader point is - imagine voting for them again with him as leader.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)