12-17-2025, 04:14 PM
(12-17-2025, 03:45 PM)baggy1 Wrote: I understand the process CC (I'm at the end of it) but my point is that the government are unlikely to make it a default position due to the risk, no matter how small. It makes sense to allow the individual to choose the level of risk and pot to go into but if the government gamble, and lose, then there will be litigation and class action AOTS. One thing that isn't being considered is the impact on the markets of a global war situation , which hopefully won't occur but the 80 odd years of consistent growth is comparable to the 100 odd years without a global pandemic (that would never happen either).
We have more to worry about than our pension funds if global war breaks out. That’s literally my thinking on it all.
I think a government should be more ambitious with their ability to affect the future. Other governments think the same and skandi countries have consciously and sustainably taken those risks, for great gain too. Some would say it’s neglectful not to. You and I have vastly different opinions on government ambition/risk taking.
Would rather talk to ChatGPT

