You can't write that's for certain when you don't want to explain something that you've been pulled up on.
Here's why it's been paid back: https://www.ipe.com/news/british-coal-st...53.article Simple article without bias. The fact is that it was the pension funds money all along as the guarantee was never needed and with just 40,000 workers left is very unlikely to be needed so the guarantee is a moot point being used to wind up people like yourself.
The surplus that was for the guarantee will never be needed.
Now based on your anger at how they've handed the money back, do you think this should be extended to all other pension funds as ultimately it will be the government that will bail out any that fail.
Here's why it's been paid back: https://www.ipe.com/news/british-coal-st...53.article Simple article without bias. The fact is that it was the pension funds money all along as the guarantee was never needed and with just 40,000 workers left is very unlikely to be needed so the guarantee is a moot point being used to wind up people like yourself.
The surplus that was for the guarantee will never be needed.
Now based on your anger at how they've handed the money back, do you think this should be extended to all other pension funds as ultimately it will be the government that will bail out any that fail.