Takeover

[Pragmatist]

Depends what you mean by significant cash?

We need the new owner to have enough wealth to keep MDS sweet and make further borrowing available should it be needed in the immediate future.  

We need the to have enough wealth absorb the losses FFP allows whilst we try to get back into the top league.

We then need them to have enough wealth to invest in the  infrastructure necessary to compete in the Premier League, and potentially add to the transfer and wages pot as FFP allows.

This does need significant cash but NOT at Nation State levels.   We wouldn't and couldn't buy £100m players regardless of the owners wealth.

Brighton and Brentford ARE the models. Although they are seen as the plucky underdogs both clubs have had significant debt absorbed and investment applied.  The numbers don't seem fantastic compared to the PL giants but they absolutely dwarf most Championship clubs budgets including our own.

Don't forget not that long ago under Ebeneezer and Dashworth we were the model club others looked to replicate (no surprise he ended up at Brighton) and a new DOF and Recruitment team should be top of any shopping list, the best any new money can buy.

Quite a lot to unpick there. 

The MSD debt will, I am confident, be discharged as part of the said deal. 

We’d only need to take out 14% finance again if our new overruns out of money altogether, taking into account the maximum levels of debt that an owner is allowed to put in (£24m over 3 years under the new rules).  If we are spending any more than that then we’ll fall foul of the new rules). 

If we get promoted then obviously we’ll receive huge extra TV revenue and other revenue, and yes the owners will be able to put in a higher annual amount as equity than in the Championship.  

Tony Bloom at Brighton has pumped in over £300m of debt, a lot of which I think has now been converted to equity.   Unlikely to be permissible to get to that level of debt in the first place going forward.  Brentford probably is the best example to follow, but I think they could well be dragged into a relegation fight this year, so it may prove to have not been sufficient. 

My view is that an owner with anything north of £200m of wealth can cover everything needed in the new sustainable model era, only borrowing money which can be serviced out of increased operating profits under a proper business model.

I think we're agreeing on the whole there Prag   £200 million seems small change compared to Nation State wealth but should just about cover it.

Deep enough pockets to absorb debt as needed and invest as FFP allows, but horse puncher type owners need not apply.

As I've said before the key is to have an owner personally and genuinely interested in making the club successful , putting in place a management team with the business acumen and knowledge to make it happen through canny transfer activity and infrastructure development. That in itself costs serious money.

Lai, let's face it, offered none of the above!!!

Id settle for being run like we were under Baldylocks self sustaining but with an owner who can and is prepared to put some money in when its needed and with a clear vision as how to grow the club in the longterm ,surely this is not to much to wish for.

We weren’t self sustaining, we relied completely on Prem TV money.

I think by “self sustaining” meant without having to inject debt or equity. Prem TV money is ordinary revenue