06-18-2023, 10:03 AM
(06-18-2023, 09:57 AM)SuperBob2002 Wrote:(06-18-2023, 09:39 AM)Pragmatist Wrote:(06-18-2023, 09:35 AM)SuperBob2002 Wrote:(06-18-2023, 07:21 AM)Ted Maul Wrote: Ben Foakes will be sat at home watching Jonny Bairstow keep wicket wondering what the hell he has to do to keep a spot in the team.
Crawley out, Bairstow to open with Duckett and Foakes back asap please.
Bairstow did take a wonderful catch for Broad's second wicket, and has kept well for 90% of the innings so far. But that missed stumping and a couple of dropped catches have cost us dearly.
Can he open the batting? I believe he's done so in ODI's, but it's a different game.
I think you have to select a specialist wicket keeper. They're vital and get you wickets when you need them most.
I agree re a specialist keeper - provided that they are good enough to bat as high as 7, which Foakes obviously is. A great keeper who is not good enough to bat that high is too much of a luxury.
In Bazball yes Bairstow could open. Not a traditional Test opener technically, but England aren’t playing traditional Test cricket!
He's certainly a better option opening than Crawley is, even taking account of his first innings knock.
I know it doesn't fit with the ultra attacking intent of England, but I'm a fan of having an attacking opener alongside a rock, Sibley for example. Someone who can stick around and be the core of an innings. There's nothing wrong with scoring .500 or lower and batting time.
I disagree. That would totally derail the way this England play. Root at 4 and (hopefully) Foakes at 7 provide that ballast.

