11-16-2020, 11:16 PM
Your responses are not facts they are opinions shared by experts you agree with. You ignore the post when I quote several worldwide authorities which disagree with you and the “single” expert you held up as a worldwide authority. You ignore the post which I submitted that your beliefs are faith based and not fact. This is based on your complete inability to admit you may be in error. I stopped posting because you are not arguing in good faith but from an obsessive self belief which is not only illogical but unrealistic. You called those who disagreed with you culpable for the impending deaths of people who would otherwise survived. I asked how someone posting on a message board could influence policy to such an extent and you failed to retract or respond. I know far too many medics who would have a somewhat jaundiced view of your beliefs. When you are tasked with why most governments and their advisers in the rest of the world sees this differently you reply that they are mistaken. This is hubris on a scale even Charles the First would have difficulty maintaining. I am prepared to admit that I am wrong. Are you? I argued that it seemed logical to me that much of what was being done was to maintain a low R number in the hope of a vaccine. Well I still think this. Seems reasonable if tiresome. You seem to think statistics tell you everything you need to know about what the virus is doing. I don’t. Because as is clear from the perpetual disagreements between you and Baggy1 stats often only tell you what you want to hear. I trust experts. You aren’t one.

