10-11-2020, 08:25 AM
Still no answer. Didn't think so. How very conservative and Cummings of you. Avoid the future cost at your own present gain. You need to take a hard look in the mirror.
I've never said it's not more deadly, it is. Can't possibly say whether it's 1.5, 2 or 3 until it's passed that's purely scaremongering. The point you so clearly want to avoid is the answer to my question.
Is 50000 , 100000 or more excess deaths over the next 10 years a price worth paying to save those now?
I've never said it's not more deadly, it is. Can't possibly say whether it's 1.5, 2 or 3 until it's passed that's purely scaremongering. The point you so clearly want to avoid is the answer to my question.
Is 50000 , 100000 or more excess deaths over the next 10 years a price worth paying to save those now?