05-06-2020, 09:19 AM
Ok - so taking away the 'science' and the personality behind all of this, what approach would you have taken? So far today you've used a questionable piece of data and focussed on a single scientist / advisor to argue your point, there are many other advisors involved in the decision making. And I would say that the vast majority of the population understand why we are locked down like this at the moment as it is in the best interests for everyone.
What would you have proposed? Just carry on without any restriction? or is there a half way house that you would suggest?
What would you have proposed? Just carry on without any restriction? or is there a half way house that you would suggest?