09-28-2019, 04:14 PM
(09-28-2019, 04:04 PM)Cuzer Wrote:(09-28-2019, 03:40 PM)fbaggy Wrote:(09-28-2019, 03:33 PM)Sliced Wrote:we also have to remember Ferguson was first choice right back before Gibbs got injured and Furlong came in due to switching Ferguson to the left so it could be Furlong who misses out if Gibbs comes back in(09-28-2019, 03:16 PM)Cuzer Wrote:(09-28-2019, 02:02 PM)HeathAyIt Wrote: Well that's sorted out who really knows their onions on here ay it.
Anyone still claiming Gibbs should be back in the side is basically a clown.
Pathetic comment Heath, and from you
Nobody was criticizing Ferguson in the slightest, he’s been great for us and great today but even Bilic said post game he’s only playing there as both our left backs are injured, makes no sense for Ferguson or Furlong to play on the wrong side when a proper and fit left back is available
Cuzer
That's out of context. He was talking about why Ferguson was initially was picked to play there. It had nothing to do with what would happen if any of our left backs became fit.
Absolutely, no doubt long term it will be Furlong v Ferguson at RB and Gibbs left back, we’re lucky to have Gibbs as he offers so much however we’re equally lucky to have Ferguson and Furlong, great to have competition all over the pitch
Cuzer
Gibbs offers jack shit defensively, always has been a liability. Going forward different kettle of fish, but not sure that's necessarily a priority at the moment.