It's The Ashes (again)

[rsbaggy2]

Controversial but not illegal.

As for Broad ... hardly the paragon of virtue.

[pindgill]

Can we call the Bairstow dismissal a Careykad!!??..

[SuperBob2002]

They just showed Bairstoe leaving his crease after every ball and Carey has thrown it to fielders, this time he’s just thrown it at the stumps.

If that’s what you have to do to win then I’d rather not.

Why aren't you criticising Bairstow for being an idiot? He's been given out for similar in the past, and as you say he was leaving his crease after every delivery. He hasn't learned from past mistakes and has been punished for stupidity and could have cost England a win (again, this time with the bat as opposed to with the gloves). 

I really don't understand the issue. It's avoidable from Bairstow and within the laws of the game. Australia have seen an opportunity and ruthlessly taken it. I'd be loving it if Bairstow got Smith out in that way. It's clever cricket from Australia and it's brain dead cricket from us.

The issue is you this is not cricket, that’s 3 dismissal’s in 2 two tests that wer not out but given by incompetent umpires and cheating Aussies.

This is out by the letter of the law. Even if I think it's a scummy way to get him out, it's still out by the letter of the law. If the Aussies claim it what are the umpires supposed to do?

He taps his foot before moving out of his crease ball should have been dead. As I’ve said incompetent umpires. It certainly woke up Stokes though hasn’t it.

In what way are they incompetent? Incompetent would be to not give it out as they would then be ignoring the laws.

[CA Baggie]

They just showed Bairstoe leaving his crease after every ball and Carey has thrown it to fielders, this time he’s just thrown it at the stumps.

If that’s what you have to do to win then I’d rather not.

Why aren't you criticising Bairstow for being an idiot? He's been given out for similar in the past, and as you say he was leaving his crease after every delivery. He hasn't learned from past mistakes and has been punished for stupidity and could have cost England a win (again, this time with the bat as opposed to with the gloves). 

I really don't understand the issue. It's avoidable from Bairstow and within the laws of the game. Australia have seen an opportunity and ruthlessly taken it. I'd be loving it if Bairstow got Smith out in that way. It's clever cricket from Australia and it's brain dead cricket from us.

He’s technically out and had to be given. 

It’s really a cunts trick though and deliberately manufactured by Carey when he’s played the ball as “dead” every time.  Then chooses not to and be a real snide.

There’s a saying - “it’s not cricket”.  Look it up and you’ll understand why they’re out of order.

[SuperBob2002]

Controversial but not illegal.

As for Broad ... hardly the paragon of virtue.

Agreed. But I'm with Broad on not walking. Why should you? It's up to the umpires to give you out. I love the win at all costs mentality and it's something I'd like to see England embrace more of.

[Peachy]

They just showed Bairstoe leaving his crease after every ball and Carey has thrown it to fielders, this time he’s just thrown it at the stumps.

If that’s what you have to do to win then I’d rather not.

Why aren't you criticising Bairstow for being an idiot? He's been given out for similar in the past, and as you say he was leaving his crease after every delivery. He hasn't learned from past mistakes and has been punished for stupidity and could have cost England a win (again, this time with the bat as opposed to with the gloves). 

I really don't understand the issue. It's avoidable from Bairstow and within the laws of the game. Australia have seen an opportunity and ruthlessly taken it. I'd be loving it if Bairstow got Smith out in that way. It's clever cricket from Australia and it's brain dead cricket from us.

The issue is you this is not cricket, that’s 3 dismissal’s in 2 two tests that wer not out but given by incompetent umpires and cheating Aussies.

This is out by the letter of the law. Even if I think it's a scummy way to get him out, it's still out by the letter of the law. If the Aussies claim it what are the umpires supposed to do?

He taps his foot before moving out of his crease ball should have been dead. As I’ve said incompetent umpires. It certainly woke up Stokes though hasn’t it.

I thought that. He very deliberately scrapes his foot to mark his crease. Clear signal that he's saying thats the over. Clearly that was missed or doesn't mean anything in the laws of the game.

[Borin' Baggie]

They just showed Bairstoe leaving his crease after every ball and Carey has thrown it to fielders, this time he’s just thrown it at the stumps.

If that’s what you have to do to win then I’d rather not.

Why aren't you criticising Bairstow for being an idiot? He's been given out for similar in the past, and as you say he was leaving his crease after every delivery. He hasn't learned from past mistakes and has been punished for stupidity and could have cost England a win (again, this time with the bat as opposed to with the gloves). 

I really don't understand the issue. It's avoidable from Bairstow and within the laws of the game. Australia have seen an opportunity and ruthlessly taken it. I'd be loving it if Bairstow got Smith out in that way. It's clever cricket from Australia and it's brain dead cricket from us.

The issue is you this is not cricket, that’s 3 dismissal’s in 2 two tests that wer not out but given by incompetent umpires and cheating Aussies.

This is out by the letter of the law. Even if I think it's a scummy way to get him out, it's still out by the letter of the law. If the Aussies claim it what are the umpires supposed to do?

He taps his foot before moving out of his crease ball should have been dead. As I’ve said incompetent umpires. It certainly woke up Stokes though hasn’t it.

It doesn't matter what the batsman does, the ball is dead when the wicketkeeper or bowler get the ball and motion the play is dead. There is nothing the umpires can do except give it out if the Aussies are calling for it.

[SuperBob2002]

Simple solution to this. Call Foakes up and give him a very clear instruction to look out for Australian batsman leaving their crease and to attempt to run them out. Play the Aussies at their own game. But I doubt their batsmen will be stupid enough to leave their crease when the ball is live.

[Peachy]

They've been showing Bairstow going walkies running up to his stumping yet the Aussies didn't do anything about it. Why Carey chose to do it then and not in the previous deliveries is anyones guess. Looking at the replays they could have done it before but chose not to. Why?

[wba13]

Everyone knows even the Aussies that the batsman were not running, they have the hump because the right decision was given yesterday when Stark grounded the ball. But because they’re pathetic losers they wanted unwarranted revenge. What they should remember is they already have 2 cheats who wrongly got their places back playing for them.
In the case of Aussies cheats do prosper.