Posts: 9,966
Threads: 357
Joined: Feb 2020
Reputation:
16
The Resolution Foundation, which actually has alumni as ministers in the government is recommending that the age workers are able to take pensions is increased from 55, and that the allowable tax free lump sum is reduced.
On top of the disincentives already implemented.
Posts: 5,467
Threads: 286
Joined: Sep 2024
Reputation:
30
Aye. That’s why I made sure I sorted that earlier this year.
Raw Sausage
Posts: 7,733
Threads: 234
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
23
Fuck’s sake. I’m 55 next summer and it’s one option that’s on the table. Not that I’ve got loads stored away but a downsize and a little nice and easy job might make it nearly possible.
Posts: 5,467
Threads: 286
Joined: Sep 2024
Reputation:
30
I’m pretty sure it changes to 57 in 2028 anyway
And more like 58 as it’s 57 and 9 months
Raw Sausage
Posts: 12,597
Threads: 463
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
35
The Resolution Foundation are a bunch of naïve, idealistic social democrats who are too scared to make tough decisions
Posts: 5,179
Threads: 276
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
35
Nye Cominetti, an economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: "Our pensions and tax rules currently incentivise very wealthy people to retire early. These generous tax breaks should be restricted."
I don't follow that at all.
Posts: 9,966
Threads: 357
Joined: Feb 2020
Reputation:
16
They want to coerce older people to work for longer. The government needs tax drones to finance welfare spending and debt interest.
Posts: 5,179
Threads: 276
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
35
I grasp what is being said but I can't see any logic in it at all.
Good luck to the wealthy I say if they have made provison to retire early. Plenty on this bored have already retired early. There are other levers that can be used to take tax from them rather than tax pensions. We will end up in a place where no one does any pension planning. Seems a bit of a dumb and daft approach to me.
I am not generally in favour of races to the bottom.