![]() |
|
It's The Ashes (again) - Printable Version +- WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk) +-- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: It's The Ashes (again) (/showthread.php?tid=29999) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
|
RE: It's The Ashes (again) - Hughie Reed 31 - 07-02-2023 How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match??? RE: It's The Ashes (again) - pindgill - 07-02-2023 (07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match??? Stokes team lost the dam test!!!.. Steve Smith’s contribution resulted in his team winning the test he rightly was MOM. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - Shabby Russian - 07-02-2023 In a test full of massive swings, usually from the batting side throwing away a massive advantage. The one key session I would pick out, was yesterday evening, there was very little the batsmen could do in the face of some brilliant bowling from Statc and Cummins. Brilliant effort from Stokes and Duckett, both would have been worthy winners of the man of the match award. But it was always improbable they we would win. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - Hughie Reed 31 - 07-02-2023 (07-02-2023, 03:51 PM)pindgill Wrote:Load of bollocks, man of the match should be based on best individual performance in the game(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match??? Hence Stokes should have got. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - rsbaggy2 - 07-02-2023 https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/jul/02/mcc-unreservedly-apologised-to-australia-after-long-room-incident-england-ashes Hope they hand out appropriate sanctions to the guilty parties. Inexcusable no matter what has gone on in the game. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - Tom Joad - 07-02-2023 (07-02-2023, 04:32 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/jul/02/mcc-unreservedly-apologised-to-australia-after-long-room-incident-england-ashes Got to hand it to them, nobody beats an aussie at crybabbying. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - rsbaggy2 - 07-02-2023 Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - Cuzer - 07-02-2023 (07-02-2023, 05:03 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me. I thought Sky were bang out of order even trying to compare the two events, I suppose when you have aussies part of the commentary team you must look for balance CDG was wrapped on the pad, the appeal went up for LBW, he went to run, then turned back and was ran out when the ball went to gully and Pope threw the stumps down Bairstow's dimissal today was like chalk and cheese, he's rubbed his foot on the crease after the ball has gone through to the keeper, trying to denote he's "in" and has walked down the pitch to his batting partner By the laws he's out, Carey actualy hasn't done much wrong but to compare it to the CDG - Pope incident is utter bollocks Cuzer (07-02-2023, 03:51 PM)pindgill Wrote:(07-02-2023, 03:47 PM)Hughie Reed 31 Wrote: How the fuck has Stokes not got man of the match??? When did the winning player ever have to be MOM? It's based on an individuals performance, not who won the game? Cuzer RE: It's The Ashes (again) - ericlegrisly - 07-02-2023 (07-02-2023, 05:06 PM)Cuzer Wrote:Exactly right. By extension of the 'must be on the winning side' logic, an all-rounder who scored double centuries in both innings out of a total of 400 (cos everybody else scored none) and took all 20 opposition wickets but lost the game as the other side scored 500 in 2 innings would not be eligible for MOTM. Nonsense. Stokes' was easily the outstanding performance of the 5 days, with nods to Smith and Duckett, and maybe Starc.(07-02-2023, 05:03 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me. RE: It's The Ashes (again) - pindgill - 07-02-2023 (07-02-2023, 05:06 PM)Cuzer Wrote:(07-02-2023, 05:03 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Wasn't De Grandhomme dismissed by Pope in similar fashion last year? Not sure but someone will be sure to correct me. It seems your clutching at straws because the Ashes are lost there’s more chance of a 0-5 whitewash than England coming back to draw the series let alone win 3-2!!!..
|