02-23-2020, 12:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-23-2020, 12:21 AM by MassDebater.)
(02-23-2020, 12:16 AM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:(02-23-2020, 12:09 AM)MassDebater Wrote: Brizzle spent £29m and received over £40m... We spent £18m and received £30m
So that puts that argument well and truly to bed.
What are the comparitive wage Bill's? That is where the cost is. We are using their profit to fund cashflow of wages
FFP wont allow them to spunk anything near a parachute payment.
No idea, but his whole argument was based on us being so rich and well off. I would assume that whilst we may have a better income overall, our wages as you suggest are likely to be significantly higher too. They certainly were last year, and as we know, higher wages does not guarantee better players.
Ours was around £92m when we got relegated and Brizzles was £27m at the same time.... Would assume ours is now a lot lower than £92m!