02-13-2019, 09:37 AM
crazy suggestion but 4 4 2.
defence picks itself but if you had 4 in the middle you'd have an extra man there (stating the bleeding obvious) it was 5 v 3 last night and we didn't get much change out of them and impose ourselves on them. 4 3 3 looks good when played in the opponents half but when we are playing out in our half ane being pushed up on, well you can all see the frailty in that.
2 decent wide players to protect the fullbacks but to also overlap with the fullbacks, Gibbs and Holgate overlapping Murphy and Phillips mebbes, how good would that be? Barry and Harper patrolling the midfield area, not all the way across thus not having to cover so much ground and then play JRod and Gayle up front through the middle, god knows Gayle is wasted out wide.
I genuinely believe this would tear the champ apart but for some reason it never gets a look in, maybe it's not fashionable enough.
just my thoughts and have been ever since we got an attacking right back in
defence picks itself but if you had 4 in the middle you'd have an extra man there (stating the bleeding obvious) it was 5 v 3 last night and we didn't get much change out of them and impose ourselves on them. 4 3 3 looks good when played in the opponents half but when we are playing out in our half ane being pushed up on, well you can all see the frailty in that.
2 decent wide players to protect the fullbacks but to also overlap with the fullbacks, Gibbs and Holgate overlapping Murphy and Phillips mebbes, how good would that be? Barry and Harper patrolling the midfield area, not all the way across thus not having to cover so much ground and then play JRod and Gayle up front through the middle, god knows Gayle is wasted out wide.
I genuinely believe this would tear the champ apart but for some reason it never gets a look in, maybe it's not fashionable enough.
just my thoughts and have been ever since we got an attacking right back in