03-19-2021, 12:56 PM
(03-19-2021, 12:51 PM)Protheroe Wrote:(03-19-2021, 12:25 PM)Borin' Baggie Wrote:(03-19-2021, 11:47 AM)Protheroe Wrote:(03-19-2021, 10:58 AM)Borin' Baggie Wrote:(03-19-2021, 10:45 AM)Protheroe Wrote: Perhaps their partisan support is for Salmond? They do like a bit of sectarianism up there so I understand.
Assuming that it was Wightman that voted with the Unionist contingent, you think a socialist and member of the Scottish Greens would be on Salmond's side?
Hang on, you're trying to convince me now that the committee isn't partisan by stating that it's voted on partisan lines? Make your mind up.
The Scottish Greens are in government in Scotland. At least one person who is a member of a party in government in Scotland, either an SNP MSP or Wightman, has voted against the government position that their party endorsed. How is that remotely partisan?
Yes, and you don't know who it is. Wee Nippy says the committee has split on "partisan" lines. I don't believe much of what she says but I'm pretty convinced that's true.
It is functionally impossible for this to be split on partisan lines, due to a member of a party in government in Scotland literally voting against their party's interests.