The Great Reset and Build Back Better
#1
Conspiracy theories aots shop. Expect tin foil supplies to run out shortly.
Reply
#2
(11-16-2020, 07:32 PM)Derek Hardballs Wrote: Conspiracy theories aots shop. Expect tin foil supplies to run out shortly.

I was literally just reading the World Economic Forum's agenda for their annual meeting in Davos in January, and how the Great Reset is a global way out of the covid crisis.

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/

You've lost me on the tin foil hat bit though.
Reply
#3
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4436

Billy G won't be happy. BMJ's balls finally dropping. £100bn. I mean they could screen all males for prostate cancer for the next 10 years for that and save many more lives
Reply
#4
I could win the euro lottery tonight but I know it ain't going to happen.
Reply
#5
(11-16-2020, 10:21 PM)billybassett Wrote: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4436

Billy G won't be happy. BMJ's balls finally dropping. £100bn. I mean they could screen all males for prostate cancer for the next 10 years for that and save many more lives

That would be a waste of money. "The evidence so far doesn’t suggest that routinely screening these men would help prevent deaths from prostate cancer."      

 https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-c.../screening

Unless of course, you believe that Cancer UK is also part of some giant international conspiracy.
Reply
#6
(11-16-2020, 10:21 PM)billybassett Wrote: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4436

Billy G won't be happy. BMJ's balls finally dropping. £100bn. I mean they could screen all males for prostate cancer for the next 10 years for that and save many more lives

I thought that was the news yesterday - isn't there going to be this mega-testing lab that will be created initially for covid testing but going forward to be used to screen and test many other diseases. Necessity (covid) being the mother of all invention could be putting us onto the health service of the future (proactive not reactive) - identifying disease through mass screening before symptoms arise is a good thing.

The article was interesting but gave no solutions or options I found. I'm far from being a fan of anything the government does but mass testing is a positive step for the future health of the nation.
Reply
#7
(11-17-2020, 09:28 AM)baggy1 Wrote:
(11-16-2020, 10:21 PM)billybassett Wrote: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4436

Billy G won't be happy. BMJ's balls finally dropping. £100bn. I mean they could screen all males for prostate cancer for the next 10 years for that and save many more lives

I thought that was the news yesterday - isn't there going to be this mega-testing lab that will be created initially for covid testing but going forward to be used to screen and test many other diseases. Necessity (covid) being the mother of all invention could be putting us onto the health service of the future (proactive not reactive) - identifying disease through mass screening before symptoms arise is a good thing.

The article was interesting but gave no solutions or options I found. I'm far from being a fan of anything the government does but mass testing is a positive step for the future health of the nation.

Could have spent a tenth of the money we've spent to date using the PCR test and contract tracing to test all males for prostate cancer for the next 5 years. 9000 die a year on average. Many could be saved.

Mass screening for a respiratory virus with a flawed test is frankly madness. Mass screening for the actual real killers in society another. The million mamograms missed, over 3 million cancer screens missed let alone others. We've treated 1 illness at the cost of every other.
Reply
#8
(11-18-2020, 11:35 AM)billybassett Wrote: Could have spent a tenth of the money we've spent to date using the PCR test and contract tracing to test all males for prostate cancer for the next 5 years. 9000 die a year on average.  Many could be saved.
To repeat the above;  That would be a waste of money. "The evidence so far doesn’t suggest that routinely screening these men would help prevent deaths from prostate cancer."      


Strange you believe a test that many scientists are happy to accept is useless and not worth the expense but choose to recommend a test which the experts in that field say is not worth is it as the results are too inconclusive.
Reply
#9
I'm going to buy a petrol station.
Reply
#10
https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/statu...3923100672
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)