You're making a major mistake with that assumption BB - you are confusing deaths with contraction which is a very dangerous misinterpretation. Forget about Proths "limited to the hospital and care sector comment", that is plain stupid as people contract it prior to going into hospital.
Whilst it is true the deaths figure is weighted very heavily against the over 65s (at least 55k of the 65k excess deaths so far this year) it doesn't mean that those under 65 are immune to the virus and we need much further evidence of longer term damage caused by this before we say that any group of people don't need to worry about it.
If you can back up the U45s can do what they want with any data on infection rates and recovery that would help me understand it better as I haven't seen any
Whilst it is true the deaths figure is weighted very heavily against the over 65s (at least 55k of the 65k excess deaths so far this year) it doesn't mean that those under 65 are immune to the virus and we need much further evidence of longer term damage caused by this before we say that any group of people don't need to worry about it.
If you can back up the U45s can do what they want with any data on infection rates and recovery that would help me understand it better as I haven't seen any