05-13-2020, 10:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2020, 10:37 PM by Borin' Baggie.)
(05-13-2020, 10:05 PM)The liquidator Wrote: Nothing on starmer this is the bloke who didnt think jimmy saville was worth prosecuting .
This is a lie China, please don't repeat it.
The remit of the CPS investigation fell under the Chief Inspector of the CPS, Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions.
The CPS investigation started in 2008, Starmer joined the CPS in 2009.
The victims identified by Sussex Police did not wish to cooperate with the CPS for their investigation which severely limited the amount of evidence that could be gathered. You can't prosecute if there's not enough evidence.
Starmer's only interaction with the case, as it was within his remit, was him issuing a review into the failings of the Savile investigation which recommended offering a better victim support network to help them feel comfortable in giving evidence. That review was issued by Starmer voluntarily, the CPS and Civil Service didn't want it to happen but Starmer forced it through so the incompetencies couldn't be covered up.
The only lawyer criticised in the report for failing to force the CPS investigators to open a prosecution was the reviewing lawyer. Starmer was not the reviewing lawyer.
I don't know whether the far right started this smear or bad faith actors like the far left Corbynistas, but it's a blatant lie that falls apart at any basic level of scrutiny. There's stronger evidence saying that the Tory top brass, including Thatcher, knew about it and covered it up and even that's as credible as a bog standard conspiracy theory.