Cummings
#31
Whichever side you are on, I'm sure we all agree that Cummings is one treacherous snake.
Reply
#32
(06-16-2021, 04:28 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: Whichever side you are on, I'm sure we all agree that Cummings is one treacherous snake.

Yeah, but so is Hancock.
Reply
#33
(06-16-2021, 04:36 PM)Borin' Baggie Wrote:
(06-16-2021, 04:28 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: Whichever side you are on, I'm sure we all agree that Cummings is one treacherous snake.

Yeah, but so is Hancock.

Whoever would have both of them in their team must either be a right buffoon or another snake.
Reply
#34
baggy1 Wrote:
Borin' Baggie Wrote:
Tom Joad Wrote:Whichever side you are on, I'm sure we all agree that Cummings is one treacherous snake.

Yeah, but so is Hancock.

Whoever would have both of them in their team must either be a right buffoon or another snake.
I suppose that's what you get if you need to surround yourself with sly bastards....
Reply
#35
(06-16-2021, 04:28 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: Whichever side you are on, I'm sure we all agree that Cummings is one treacherous snake.

It would be hard for him to be trusted by an employer after this you would think, but maybe he does not care and is thinking of a book deal or something like that
Reply
#36
(06-16-2021, 05:29 PM)Mayo Wrote:
(06-16-2021, 04:28 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: Whichever side you are on, I'm sure we all agree that Cummings is one treacherous snake.

It would be hard for him to be trusted by an employer after this you would think, but maybe he does not care and is thinking of a book deal or something like that

Some have entrusted the country to a PM who has been sacked twice for lying and has consistently lied in office I imagine he will still get employed by someone after he spaffs off just like Cummings will.
Reply
#37
(06-16-2021, 01:21 PM)Protheroe Wrote: I told you Hancock was fucking useless years ago...

You may have done, I don't remember, but we'd probably have spotted it anyway.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
{myadvertisements[zone_2]}