Cahill - Printable Version +- WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk) +-- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Cahill (/showthread.php?tid=5748) Pages:
1
2
|
Cahill - Pragmatist - 08-03-2019 Have heard of a potential link with Cahill, who’s only 33 (which surprised me). Can’t see it happening, but would be an interesting one on a one-year contract and an option in our favour. Is a free agent so is currently earning zilch. RE: Cahill - Cunninghamismagic - 08-03-2019 Still a good player. Woukd think wages would be an issue though RE: Cahill - Super_Slav - 08-03-2019 (08-03-2019, 09:13 AM)Pragmatist Wrote: Have heard of a potential link with Cahill, who’s only 33 (which surprised me). Can’t see it happening, but would be an interesting one on a one-year contract and an option in our favour. Is a free agent so is currently earning zilch. Talk of Welbeck too RE: Cahill - albion_pigeon - 08-03-2019 Markovic available on a free. RE: Cahill - baggiebloke - 08-03-2019 Cahill could be superb for us. Wages... RE: Cahill - Psalm23 - 08-03-2019 (08-03-2019, 09:25 AM)Super_Slav Wrote:(08-03-2019, 09:13 AM)Pragmatist Wrote: Have heard of a potential link with Cahill, who’s only 33 (which surprised me). Can’t see it happening, but would be an interesting one on a one-year contract and an option in our favour. Is a free agent so is currently earning zilch. Remember this? Super_Slav Member Posts: 205 Threads: 29 Joined: Jun 2019 Reputation: 0 #8 07-27-2019, 12:45 PM (07-27-2019, 12:38 PM)The liquidator Wrote: Wrote:Apparently Danny welbeck was at the game[size=undefined] Load of rubbish pal. Just someone making up rumours[/size] https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=5601&pid=91791&highlight=welbeck#pid91791 RE: Cahill - Boutros - 08-03-2019 (08-03-2019, 09:42 AM)Psalm23 Wrote:(08-03-2019, 09:25 AM)Super_Slav Wrote:(08-03-2019, 09:13 AM)Pragmatist Wrote: Have heard of a potential link with Cahill, who’s only 33 (which surprised me). Can’t see it happening, but would be an interesting one on a one-year contract and an option in our favour. Is a free agent so is currently earning zilch. Fugging brilliant RE: Cahill - Big Daddy Cool - 08-03-2019 (08-03-2019, 09:42 AM)Psalm23 Wrote:(08-03-2019, 09:25 AM)Super_Slav Wrote:(08-03-2019, 09:13 AM)Pragmatist Wrote: Have heard of a potential link with Cahill, who’s only 33 (which surprised me). Can’t see it happening, but would be an interesting one on a one-year contract and an option in our favour. Is a free agent so is currently earning zilch. Oh dear. Now I don't know what to believe... RE: Cahill - ABBaggie - 08-03-2019 Think the Cahill link is a mistake more than anything. There is an article doing the rounds on Twitter which cites the Mirror transfer blog as the source for a report highlighting our interest in Cahill, but the actual blog says Burnley, Palace and West Ham. RE: Cahill - Duffers - 08-03-2019 Cahill? No thanks, too old, too expensive, has barely kicked a ball in a year. Welbeck? No thanks, too crocked. Might as well get Sturridge and Carroll while we’re at it. |