![]() |
|
UK Covid death toll - Printable Version +- WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk) +-- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Politics (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Thread: UK Covid death toll (/showthread.php?tid=10162) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
|
RE: UK Covid death toll - baggy1 - 10-27-2020 I think you're probably misreading my data - i'm talking about excess deaths not cases and only using cases for comparing the excess deaths to the equivalent point for hospitalisations. We have to use previous trends to understand where we may be going again. One major difference this time will be that old folk won't be sent off to infect the other old folk and so I would expect the excess deaths to be less, but if let run wild it will kill more people, of that there isn't any doubt. There are approx 12m people in the country over 65 that are vulnerable to this virus, we need to have a viable solution that doesn't risk their health. RE: UK Covid death toll - Ted Maul - 10-27-2020 (10-27-2020, 11:31 AM)billybassett Wrote:(10-27-2020, 10:41 AM)baggy1 Wrote: Not strictly true billy, the figures that are showing is for all deaths including influenza and other respiratory illnesses and is still higher this year. You get into problems when you start trying to compare what has been written on a death cert. I'm trying to keep this simple with the 'there are more / less people dying this year' approach - that way we can see the impact of anything different this year (clearly covid). In fairness to New Zealand, they also had a stadium full of people to watch a rugby match the other week and have had barely any deaths. Swings and roundabouts. RE: UK Covid death toll - billybassett - 10-27-2020 (10-27-2020, 11:40 AM)baggy1 Wrote: I think you're probably misreading my data - i'm talking about excess deaths not cases and only using cases for comparing the excess deaths to the equivalent point for hospitalisations. We have to use previous trends to understand where we may be going again. Again you're assuming they all died OF covid. Are we now not seeing a rise in deaths because people didn't get treatment over the summer? They didn't. They had it on their death certificate, 28 days blah blah. RE: UK Covid death toll - baggy1 - 10-27-2020 This gets circular as an argument and I would say that there will be a potential for both of those to be included in excess deaths - again why I try to stick to the excess deaths figure because without Covid those excess deaths wouldn't have occurred (directly or indirectly). And we've discussed this before and I still haven't seen any argument against locking down in March, it was needed otherwise the 1st wave would have kept increasing - the deaths only started falling 3 weeks after lockdown. It's too early to say if the 2nd wave is because of covid deaths but it does appear to be happening, whatever the reason - denying covid won't make one ounce of difference to that fact. We just have to wait and see how much of an impact it will have. And I have never quoted the figures of covid deaths in anything I have posted btw. RE: UK Covid death toll - billybassett - 10-27-2020 This is interesting: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/government-response-stringency-index-vs-biweekly-change-in-confirmed-covid-19-cases?time=2020-09-25 No correlation, in t his dataset, between a country's lockdown stringency and its mortality impact. I've only sense checked it but I know Argentina and Israel were hard lockers and Belarus and Sweden as we know less so. (10-27-2020, 01:15 PM)baggy1 Wrote: This gets circular as an argument and I would say that there will be a potential for both of those to be included in excess deaths - again why I try to stick to the excess deaths figure because without Covid those excess deaths wouldn't have occurred (directly or indirectly). And we've discussed this before and I still haven't seen any argument against locking down in March, it was needed otherwise the 1st wave would have kept increasing - the deaths only started falling 3 weeks after lockdown. I'm not denying Covid. That would be like denying flu. It's happening because it's flu season. RE: UK Covid death toll - baggy1 - 10-27-2020 That chart is a point in time chart billy, it will change in a couple of weeks if I'm reading it right. Belarus figures may be inaccurate as they deny it's existence and they beat up their protesters with 'government' troops and sweden was a car crash compared with its neighbours. And Whats happening because it's flu season? RE: UK Covid death toll - billybassett - 10-27-2020 (10-27-2020, 03:40 PM)baggy1 Wrote: That chart is a point in time chart billy, it will change in a couple of weeks if I'm reading it right. Belarus figures may be inaccurate as they deny it's existence and they beat up their protesters with 'government' troops and sweden was a car crash compared with its neighbours. The point is at any pt in time there's no correlation and the movement is very interesting at a country level. Clearly shows that all we did by locking down in the first place was kick the can down the line. Wales and Scotland's lockdowns now will see it return in a ripple just for Christmas - saft fookers the celts RE: UK Covid death toll - baggy1 - 10-27-2020 The lockdown was to give time for the NHS to get over the worst part whilst our erstwhile leaders devised a plan to help reduce the infections by identifying where they are and managing the situation in micro-lockdowns. They obviously thought fuck that for a game of soldiers it's easier just to lock down the North. RE: UK Covid death toll - foreveralbion - 10-27-2020 if you genuinely think that either local or national lockdowns are the answer how on earth can they work if schools and unis are still open? RE: UK Covid death toll - billybassett - 10-27-2020 I think they did the right thing in March as they weren't quite sure what the virus was. Reports from Italy and China suggested 3% mortality rate. Ioannidis paper across 61 global studies now shows 0.12-0.2%. i. the fucking e. flu There's absolutely no excuse for it now. In fact they are killing people by doing it. |