Villa - FFP !
#31
(01-24-2020, 08:07 AM)Duffers Wrote: Didn’t Purslow write the FFP legislation? If anyone knows where the loopholes are it’s him.

That’s the standard response being used by Villa fans at present.  Knowing the loopholes and exploiting them correctly aren’t the same thing.  I’ve heard it suggested that it was Purslow who persuaded Shaun Harvey at the EFL to create the loophole and that Purslow had Harvey in his pocket, which was why Villa weren’t properly investigated last season.  Harvey has since departed under a cloud and Rick Parry is “looking into things very closely” as his successor...
Reply
#32
(01-23-2020, 10:16 PM)The liquidator Wrote: Just flatten the place hopefully with it full to the rim the cunts

Shudders Confused
Reply
#33
(01-24-2020, 06:36 AM)rsbaggy2 Wrote:
(01-23-2020, 09:58 PM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(01-23-2020, 09:40 PM)rsbaggy2 Wrote: Would they not look at rental yield? ..ie Derby and Veela need to be paying a commercial rent and that rent would be indicative of the value of the stadium.

That is the traditional way to achieve Market Value. If you apply a yield of 7%, this gives a market rent of £4M p.a.

Is £4M a realistic rent for a stadium that hosts 20 games, and a few rock concerts, with very little other income?

As a commercial property a viable investment would surely look at yields of 7% and perhaps more.

5% would not get many investors looking to deal.

Wrong way around, RS. The lower the yield, the higher the capital value. The calculation is counter intuitive.
Reply
#34
The fishy thing about the valuations (apart from the obvious) is that they came to just about the right amount to cover the losses. Coincidence?  Dodgy

(01-23-2020, 10:41 PM)Hopalong Wrote:  It's only financially viable use would be as a development site for housing.

If they ever did flatten VP and built a new housing estate there, I always thought calling it 'Aston Villas' would be a nice touch.
Reply
#35
(01-24-2020, 10:17 AM)chasetownbaggie Wrote: The fishy thing about the valuations (apart from the obvious) is that they came to just about the right amount to cover the losses. Coincidence?  Dodgy

(01-23-2020, 10:41 PM)Hopalong Wrote:  It's only financially viable use would be as a development site for housing.

If they ever did flatten VP and built a new housing estate there, I always thought calling it 'Aston Villas' would be a nice touch.

The value is in Residential planning, but the area is historically industrial use. It would need a major planning scheme to redevelop the area.

Seal City is a far better name.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)