Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Dortmund bomb
#1
Looks like the person responsible did it for money and was a city trader not a terrorist.
Reply
#2
Well he's still a terrorist.
Reply
#3
Strange that news articles about this say it "wasn't a terrorist attack", when it's very clear no matter the motive that it was designed to cause terror.
Reply
#4
How is he not a terrorist?
Reply
#5
The definition of terrorism is: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Financial gain isn't terrorism. Otherwise every violent robbery would be a terrorist act.

What this does show is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions...
Reply
#6
(04-21-2017, 08:24 AM)P_K Wrote: How is he not a terrorist?

Because he didn't shout allahu akbar as the bomb went off . . .
Reply
#7
(04-21-2017, 08:47 AM)wewerehereonce Wrote:
(04-21-2017, 08:24 AM)P_K Wrote: How is he not a terrorist?

Because he didn't shout allahu akbar as the bomb went off . . .

These Hawaiians have got a lot to answer for, tellin yis.
Reply
#8
(04-21-2017, 08:53 AM)Fido Wrote:
(04-21-2017, 08:47 AM)wewerehereonce Wrote:
(04-21-2017, 08:24 AM)P_K Wrote: How is he not a terrorist?

Because he didn't shout allahu akbar as the bomb went off . . .

These Hawaiians have got a lot to answer for, tellin yis.

Arf!  Big Grin

FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takbir
Reply
#9
(04-21-2017, 08:27 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote: The definition of terrorism is: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Financial gain isn't terrorism. Otherwise every violent robbery would be a terrorist act.

What this does show is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions...

Thank fug for that Shrek, I don't have add anything but thank you.
Reply
#10
(04-21-2017, 08:27 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote: The definition of terrorism is: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Financial gain isn't terrorism. Otherwise every violent robbery would be a terrorist act.

What this does show is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions...

Spot on

Can only assume the bogus letter was written by Josh
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)