Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fair and balanced review of Chelsea game
#1
especially towards Pulis.

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2...n-analysis
Reply
#2
Fair and balanced? I'd call it patronising as fuck.

Their hatred of Pulis is amusing considering that they worship the rich man's Pulis.
Reply
#3
(12-09-2016, 10:34 PM)Hopalong Wrote: especially towards Pulis.

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2...n-analysis

No disrespect intended and all, if you are the author and such - if not it maybe a good thing, but it seems like a Harry Potter fan wrote it.
Reply
#4
At risk of triggering the pedant claxon I'd also call it a 'preview'.
Reply
#5
What a pile of shite. Utterly deplorable club who would be no better off than us were it not for new money that has wrecked and unbalanced football.
Reply
#6
Quote:over his board’s refusal to sell actual, talented footballer Saido Berahino and allow the manager more money to embezzle spend on six-foot-five, seventeen-stone, single-digit-IQ hoofball thugs.
Didn't know we were interested in the Chelsea Caveman - Costa.
Reply
#7
That strikethrough thing is hilarious. Wish they'd done more of it
Reply
#8
I'm sure Athers was being sarcastic..... "fair and balanced".... "especially towards Pulis".

Give yourselves a group whoosh Big Grin

Why fish with a hook when you can use a trawler net? Big Grin Big Grin
Reply
#9
Subtlety is not their strong point it seems. They tried to ram too much humour jokes instead of having a satisfactory build up and punchline.
Reply
#10
(12-10-2016, 11:30 AM)superbobby Wrote: Subtlety is not their strong point it seems. They tried to ram too much humour jokes instead of having a satisfactory build up and punchline.

Bit like Brian Dick from the Brum Mail before he "disappeared" with his disappearance coming swiftly after including "AFI" in one of his "articles"
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)