Man City's defence - Printable Version +- WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk) +-- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: WBAUnofficial (https://wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Man City's defence (/showthread.php?tid=7334) |
Man City's defence - Cunninghamismagic - 11-10-2019 Pants. No shock with John Stones playing. Unfortunately the bin dippers look very good. RE: Man City's defence - Sliced - 11-10-2019 This has to be one of the most one sided 0-2 downs I've ever seen RE: Man City's defence - Duffers - 11-10-2019 Not replacing Kompany will cost them the title. One for the “Henderson is shit” brigade there. RE: Man City's defence - wba13 - 11-10-2019 Admittedly city defence is shit but the out come could be so different if VAR did it’s job properly, 2 definite penalties have been turned down by both Oliver and VAR . Definite hand ball and a blatant push by Mane on Sterling . If there not going to use it right fuck it off. The directive at the start of season was any hand ball by defensive side was a penalty, as that changed or is it your not allowed to give penalty’s against Liverpool. RE: Man City's defence - Dreamkiller - 11-10-2019 There are different rules on handball depending on if you're the attacking or defending team. Any handball whatsoever by the attacking team in the penalty area will result in a free-kick to the defending team, whereas a handball by the defending team will be judged on stuff like 'unnatural position'. 'Is it a Liverpool player?' might also be a factor. RE: Man City's defence - Hopalong - 11-10-2019 (11-10-2019, 04:51 PM)Cunninghamismagic Wrote: Pants. No shock with John Stones playing. The bin dippers were shite and had such the run of the ball it was incredulous. City dominated the game and should have scored 4/5/6. Should have had at least 2 penalties too. Did VAR have the afternoon off? Not one decision in the whole game full of incident went to VAR? Absolute fucking disgrace. |